I found this  in either Archives or Articles: by Adam Lyttle » 2006-08-23 13:58:23#5684[/font][/size]

Ok, I'll explain by example:

Take the following scores: (scroll down a bit to see rest of explanation.)
[size=4][font=Roboto, sans-serif]

Position 1, 15 Seconds, 10 Moves
Position 2, 25 Seconds, 10 Moves
Position 3, 30 Seconds, 10 Moves

The scores are calculated as follows:

Position 1, 15+10 = 25
Position 2, 25+10 = 35
Position 3, 30+10 = 40

To make sure the lowest time and moves are rewarded (and not the highest) the scores are then removed. This also helps to give more points to games that take longer to complete.

Position 1: 40 Points
Position 2: 35 Points
Position 3: 25 Points

There are limitations on the amount of time for each game (this prevents someone from inflating their scores by creating a fake account that takes an obscene amount of time to finish each game).

and i thought 106 was doing well how the heck now to find mid 90's hmmm

Wow, Ruby!

10, J, Q all first for 97.

Hi Every 1 -- I finished this 1 with 125 moves.  Knit 01

I'd leave a clue but I got 95 on my first try. I think penguin is more qualified to leave a James. What say you, penguin?

Thanks, Rich. I can say without fear of contradiction I remember none of that. LOL 

Continuing from last time discussions abut scoring

I have a vague recollection that sometime in the hazy past, there was a post from the administrator(?) saying that you are rewarded for  how many cards auto play up at the end, and maybe something about you are rewarded for how few times you've played a given game.  Of course, at my age I can convince myself that I remember almost anything...