At least the one who gets low score is noted below on the graph (when you play through to register your score). But this is the only place I've seen where you can finish first but be listed last or anywhere in between. I've mentioned this before but didn't get anywhere.

Might be a question to put to Yuriy...

Just looked at stats. My idea doesn't work. Very strange!

I think it's worked on low score and fast time. So lowest moves and fastest time will show first, 2nd should be next one with lowest moves and fastest time in the group. Does this make sense?
Good night! 😴

Here here, I totally agree, when you attain your star that should be where you're placed, after all, if you are the first one, it needs to be noted !!

There is no rhyme nor reason to it, James. Robin got low score first today and yet he's listed as #18. Layla, even though she plays late, is almost always listed in first place. With all of the so-called miraculous abilities of the computer, I don't understand why players' names can't be listed in the order that they get low score. Evidently, it can't be done or, at least, it's not a priority to make that happen.

The hierarchy of the moves column is the strangest, as for placement of people, no way to figure out how it's rated, unlike the time column...

For the time being, we're safe !

Doggone, it's not my fastest time...

That's a record time for me !!