Menu

Player rankings - What do you think?

by Adam Lyttle » 2006-08-28 16:01:17 #4821

I had a thought, and I would like to get everyones opinion about this. When you click the stats button should the top 30 players load up or should it automatically start on the page where you are located?

For example, lets say you are ranked 35th. Should the stats load up players 1 - 30, or should it automatically load players 31 - 60?

Additionally, should this be the case for all of the stats or should it be restricted to the player rankings screen?

I would like to get everyones opinion about this one. If you have any thoughts please feel free to post them here.

by fraug » 2006-08-28 17:29:57 #5843

Why not both? How about it shows the top ten and then maybe the ten around you or something like that? Also I've always thought the link should be called "rankings" instead of "stats" .. Stats makes me think it's my own stats.

by Adam Lyttle » 2006-08-28 12:19:47 #5844

I think you raise a good point about the name of "stats".

Rankings is definitely more descriptive.

by Xavor » 2006-08-28 15:16:23 #5845

I like your idea there @Adam Lyttle, I still think that awards need different colours though cool
If I want to attempt (and I say attempt as it's not always possible) to beat someone's time it's noce to know if a star's for time and not helpfulness cool

by Barbara » 2006-08-28 16:44:38 #5846

I like having the top scorers in the stats. It gives me an incentive to try and beat a score. It is also nice knowing how fast these players are! Have both like fraug said but on our individual stats page.